🖐 Blackjack Experiment [Archive] - promo.newreviewcasino.site

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🎰

Filter:
Sort:
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Also acts as a waterproofer for walls, above ground structures General Waterproofing: for use on concrete, fibre/cement, render, plaster etc.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
See & Choose Black Roof Coatings (solventbased)

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Also acts as a waterproofer for walls, above ground structures General Waterproofing: for use on concrete, fibre/cement, render, plaster etc.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
blackjack roof

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Also acts as a waterproofer for walls, above ground structures General Waterproofing: for use on concrete, fibre/cement, render, plaster etc.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
How To Foundation Coating

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

I decided to check out other products and that's when I found Blackjack premium silicone roof coating. It cost far more but if it lasted as the manufacture claims, I.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
See & Choose Roof Leak Repair

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Shop Black Bitumen Waterproof Paint Weatherproof Protective Coating 5ltr. It doesn't work, cheap stuff, I would suggest to go for a proper Blackjack paint.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
BLACKJACK Taking a close look at the walls during a damp Hour Of Power

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Damp proof retaining walls Waterproofing basement structures Building blocks, concrete, brick, wood and metal Easy to apply and clean up.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
maintaining cast iron gutters with everbuild black jack bitumen paint

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

an experiment to determine if blackjack Ultra-Roof white siliconized elastomeric coating kills fish. I'm not testing it's ability to waterproof.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
How to install a liquid damp proof membrane

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

General Waterproofing: for use on concrete, fibre/cement, render, plaster etc. For waterproofing structures such as bridge abutments, retaining walls and culverts.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
HOW TO USE PRIMERO BITUMEN IN WATERPROOFING YOUR HOUSE?

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

May be applied by brush to waterproof and re-seal many different types of roof coverings, including: Asphalt roofs, Built-up felt roofs, Concrete roof decks.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
How To Roof Leak Repair

🔥

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

SAFETY DATA SHEET according to Regulation (EC) No. / Everbuild Blackjack D.P.M. Revision Date Version Print Date


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
EVERBUILD blackjack bitumen rolling painting concrete bathroom floor DOES IT WORK???

Mike Thanks for your input. Now, practically everyone on the forum uses the stuff. Could it have been toxic to fish? That is why most people don't mind using what is tried and true. Ill see what I can find at the plumbing salvage store. I will either prove or disprove the theory that blackjack kills fish I realize that even if two years from now the fish is still alive and all seems well, that the naysayers will still say, "it doesn't prove a thing" I also know that if the fish dies, they'll do a little happy dance, high five each other and say, "I told you so" I didn't become a debt free 41 years old man with a paid off , dollar house by wasting money unnecessarily Not sure what this statement has to do with this experiment? Lesson learned! Also, it goes on as thin as any household paint. I'm doing it for my own quest for true knowledge, in spite of them That's where you are wrong We have all said this is not the right product but if you must prove it to yourself then have at it. Just like I don't think it would be cool to catch and release koi in lake, I choose not to use them or goldfish as guinea pigs. For the record I will not add fish if there is any odor or film in the water. Ill do those experiments afterwards if the fish live. A roofing sealant is NOT designed to be submersed constantly in water, thus the warning from the manufacturer concerning the need to eliminate "pooling" or puddling on the roof. It might be more costly short term but the long term cost of having to completely overhaul a pond coating that is inappropriate would be far greater. Nope, that would be their "white jack" coating. None of that was said prior to my chiming in on that thread Steve is awesome,, extremely friendly and helpful,,, but, as far as this product is concerned,, have any of y'all used this product or it's ingredients with fish?

View Full Version : Blackjack Experiment. Your blackjack waterproofer is taken If it turns blackjack waterproofer that it doesn't kill fish, it could be used in a lot of temporary applications Your application is blackjack waterproofer to what the manufacturer recommends submerged and I venture to read more they would not condone it for use with aquatic life.

My second observation, upon applying it, was that it is a lot thinner of consistency than I expected. Heck, knowledge and information are goodness.

Sure, but someone https://promo.newreviewcasino.site/blackjack/jamie-and-blackjack-randall.html it was worth a try, and the outcome blackjack waterproofer that it was reasonably safe to use.

I was just funnin' with ya, and probably a little guilty of piling on.

I was expecting it to be shiny and feel like rubber. I am a lot more optimistic at this point than I was in the beginning, given the lack of a noxious smell and the apparent durability. Ill be using one 17 gallon Multi-purpose steel utility tub, one gallon of blackjack and one roll of self adhesive cement board tape for the initial construction. I say "go for it," and thank you for sharing your results. If they die, well, there's your answer. For the record, the instructions do say to seal and patch with the patch and sealant first. However, after roughly 2 weeks, I filled the pond and added the fish. I'm wanting to do something cool, like fund an old well pump or something for the return. Good call, is there anything different between the black and white? FYI the label states that it is not recommended for use on roofs where pooling occurs. In my case, Birdman Steve Joneli told me about this product after he himself preformed some "tests" with it. Personally, I think it is always interesting to perform "experiments" such as these. I placed a ring of cement board tape around the lip to help prevent peeling from the top down. This whole experiment was borne out of spite IMHO, to prove a few others wrong who have told you and the OP on the other thread not to use "roofing material" to coat a pond. I agree, and I support your test. I am really surprised at the mildness of the fumes. How do people know it works? Might be easier just to coat something with this product and toss it into a stable, established pond with known healthy fish. It didn't do what I wanted it to do and that was seal a brand new, very smoothly finished concrete pond. Cool, I guess I was picturing black. This rather flies in the face of your previous statement about not advocating its use. It went on smoothly and easily. Not sure how accurate an experiment this is as there re so many variables with a " new" aquatic environment , not to mention where you will get the poor fish for this experiment. But have at it. Not sure what this statement has to do with this experiment? And if you didn't want anyone here to voice their opinions on this experiment,then why post it? Use the right products for the job and if you do the research BEFORE you begin to dig, and you find doing it the "right way" is too costly, then I would agree with Russ's statement. Applied a second coat today. After opening the can my first observation was a very mild paint smell. However, I do agree, and am in the camp with others, but hey, do what you want here. I don't want to boil the fish. Not to mention the angst of seeing valued purchases that a lot of us view as pets dying off. Keep us posted. It does not state why this is the recommendation. This is just an experiment I am not recommending anyone else use it On post number 2, I stated that it says not to use where pooling will occur I will run this experiment as long as it takes But it's "cheaper" I didn't become a debt free 41 years old man with a paid off , dollar house by wasting money unnecessarily. I owe a great debt of gratitude to Koiphen,,, please bare with me and try to not judge me too harshly. I slapped that stuff on really good and gave it two coats. For the sake of the experiment's desire to replicate a pond environment, I will not be using activated carbon After an hour or so of drying it has the texture of flat wall paint. Thanks for your input. DO NOT apply to flat surfaces, poor drainage areas, or where ponding water will exist. Guys,,, seriously,,, I'm not trying to ruffle anyone's feathers, on purpose, by conducting this experiment I enjoy the educational process,,, which is part of why I am about to start construction on a gallon water garden, even though my pond is only three months old,,, I saw, in another thread, some serious criticism towards someone for simply asking if this was a viable option Being the "do'er" that I am,,, I thought that this question was begging for a definitive answer,,, not an emotional barage of criticism I realize the sensitivity of putting a goldfish in harms way, I apologize if this triggers an emotion,, if I witness any distress I will immediately cease and dissist with the experiment I have made a few acquaintences on here and don't desire any enemies. I think we all know the end results, but everything is a theory until tested and proven one way or another. But, would I ever use the product again? It went on like liquid tar. I will add at least one more tomorrow then let it sit for a few days to allow the possibility for anything dangerous to gas out If when I add water and there isn't anything obviously dangerous, I will add filtration, plants and a goldfish. We shall see But it's "cheaper". The stuff is cheap and readily available at hardware stores. I went with white over black for water temperature reasons. Well, killing a few goldfish, if it actually happens, is no more than what labs do with rats, chimps etc.! I've applied one coat today. I will do one more coat tomorrow, then start working on the filtration for it. Different materials manufacturers perform different tests based on what the product is used for. That is why there are certain products recommended by those that have been around awhile. I can definitely believe it would take several coats to truly waterproof anything it is applied to. I'm not testing it's ability to waterproof, it's durability, longevity or anything else. I'm thinking a cool thing about this might be, that since it is white and appears to have the same consistency as paint, you might be able to take it to a Sherwin Williams and have them make it any color you want. So, you are just doing this to see if it will kill the fish? Never lost a fish in 2 years! After a week of curing, I went to see how it was doing, and I still left footprints in it. Just like I would never cull a litter of puppies because they didn't have the quality markings I would prefer, I won't be using koi for this experiment I think that you will see failure in the coating before you even add the fish.