🤑 'Jiggery-Pokery': The Justices Have A Punny Way With Words : It's All Politics : NPR

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🍒

Filter:
Sort:
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

"Words no longer have meaning," Scalia whined today. In reality, words are fine. What lacks meaning are Scalia's unhinged complaints.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Pure applesauce.” 2. Jiggery-pokery — King v. Burwell. In the same case, Scalia argued that the interpretation of “such” in a particular phrase in.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Scalia's 'jiggery-pokery' dissent spawns 'scalia4kids' tweets came to an end, Justice Antonin Scalia flaunted his word knowledge in dissents.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

"Words no longer have meaning," Scalia whined today. In reality, words are fine. What lacks meaning are Scalia's unhinged complaints.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Scalia's 'jiggery-pokery' dissent spawns 'scalia4kids' tweets came to an end, Justice Antonin Scalia flaunted his word knowledge in dissents.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Antonin Scalia decries 'jiggery-pokery' of 'SCOTUScare' in scathing dissent. This article is more than 4 years old. Conservative justice calls the.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Scalia issued a blistering dissent that described the majority's reasoning as “​interpretive jiggery-pokery,” Slate posted an online “Scalia 'Sick.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Pure applesauce.” 2. Jiggery-pokery — King v. Burwell. In the same case, Scalia argued that the interpretation of “such” in a particular phrase in.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Justice Scalia has pioneered using the words "tutti-frutti," "argle-bargle" and "​jiggery-pokery" in the dissenting opinions of the nation's highest.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

🤑

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Justice Scalia has pioneered using the words "tutti-frutti," "argle-bargle" and "​jiggery-pokery" in the dissenting opinions of the nation's highest.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
jiggery pokery scalia

Two years ago tomorrow, the U. Today, as my msnbc colleague Irin Carmon reported , Scalia was once again in rare form today in his King v. And while the justices have irreconcilable differences over how to interpret the Constitution, they actually all agree on how to interpret statutory text. See National Federation of Independent Business v. On page 17 of the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts even mocks the dissenters for making the opposite conclusion that they drew three years ago:. More Like This.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Statutory interpretation is something the Supreme Court does all the time, week in and week out, term after term. Burwell dissent. Every justice subscribes to the notion that statutory language has to be understood in context. In reality, words are still fine. Writing on their behalf, Scalia accused the majority of acting in bad faith just to save the law. No, seriously. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}By Steve Benen. Sebelius, U. The dissent in King is literally hard to believe. Justice Scalia said it from the bench just last month, during an argument about the proper interpretation of the federal Fair Housing Act.